Devin Review iter #5 flagged a pre-existing class of name/id mismatch
in app/api/query.py:131-136 — the SAME root cause as the bq.* RBAC
issue I fixed in iter #3 (line 332/362). Devin called it out as
"NOT introduced by this PR" / "might merit follow-up", but it's
exactly the same security-boundary pattern this PR is hardening, so
fixing here keeps the RBAC story consistent across the handler.
The `forbidden = all_views - set(allowed)` comparison mixed types:
- `all_views` carries DuckDB master view names (= registry display
`name` from the orchestrator's CREATE VIEW)
- `set(allowed)` carries registry IDs (resource_grants.resource_id)
When `id != name` (e.g. id="bq.finance.ue", name="ue"), authorized
users got spurious 403s — the view name landed in `forbidden` even
though the caller had a valid grant on the registry id.
Build a name->id map from the registry, then the forbidden check
compares apples to apples:
allowed_view_names = {r["name"] for r in registry_rows
if r.get("name") and r.get("id") in allowed_ids}
forbidden = all_views - allowed_view_names
107 affected tests pass; 487 pass in wider RBAC/query/access/admin
domain — no regressions.
4bd1919f77